Do we really need a “Label” for everything?

Do we really need to define ourself all the time? Do we really need a name to define our social status, our relationships status, our job, our car, our politc view, religious view, our style, our taste, to define us musically, artistically… an so on…

Do I seriously need to label myself?

Apparently nowadays yes! Labeling is humanity’s pet peeve. We all have a tendency to classify things. Anything that is not labeled is an anomaly and as humans, we are annoyed and discomforted by anomalies.

It’s how we make sense of things. We separate the world into categories so we can understand it more easily. We’re also usually trying to be a part of a group or reject a group or both which means we’ll allow ourselves to fall into one category.

People claim that labeling is a bad thing , but people have the need  to “belong”. There for we label to have people to belong to and socialize with thanks to a natural right.

Labeling means naming. Things almost always have to be named to be known. The human mind is aware of many things, some of which are more similar than different and others that are more different than similar. To make sense of these things an intelligent person assigns them to categories based on similarities. These categories are usually given names. This is what labeling people means. This is not necessarily a bad thing. Not all labels are negative. Not all of it involves dehumanizing or objectifying others. And not all objectification is bad either. Sometimes these categories are not very intelligently designed. Crude categories and hasty generalizations are problems with organized human life. Yet it would be impossible to think without them. If you could live without thinking of categories of things you would probably not be able to think of very much. It is best to accept these limitations of your mind and try to be aware of them. Also try to be open to people who are different from the types you know and recognise that individuality is real too…!

Label Quotes :

“Was it Kierkegaard or Dick Van Patten who said, ‘If you label me, you negate me’?”- Wayne Cambell in “Wayne’s World”

“Labels are for cans, not people” – Anthony Rapp

“They stick you with those names, those labels – ‘rebel’ or whatever; whatever they like to use. Because they need a label; they need a name. They need something to put the price tag on the back of.”- Johnny Depp

“Man is the only critter who feels the need to label things as flowers or weeds.”-Unknown

“Follow the path of the unsafe, independent thinker. Expose your ideas to the danger of controversy. Speak your mind and fear less the label of ‘crackpot” than the stigma of conformity.” – Thomas J. Watson, Sr.

“It transcends a label. It’s a story of two human beings that are in love; get over the fact that it’s two men — that’s the point.” – Heath Ledger

“The American spirit wears no political label. In service to others and yes, in sacrifice for our country, there are no Republicans; there are no Democrats; there are only Americans.” – Senator John Kerry

“I’m fighting the label of “Black” actress simply because it’s very limiting in people’s eyes, especially people who are making movies.” – Whoopi Goldberg

“To label me an intellectual is a misunderstanding of what that is.” – Dick Cavett

“I wouldn’t eat things that didn’t have a label. So if you gave me an apple, I wouldn’t eat that because it didn’t have the exact nutritional value.” – Charlie Mileski

“That’s one of those things that will really hurt me personally, if I label a character or think about what it might do if it were to do well. I just try to do a good job with it.” – Luke Wilson

“I guess you’d call me an independent, since I’ve never identified myself with one party or another in politics. I always decide my vote by taking as careful a look as I can at the actual candidates and issues themselves, no matter what the party label.” – Jackie Robinson

“Everyone wants to label guys, label me as a backup point guard, a guy that can’t get it done. Those are the opportunities where you have to step up and make it happen.” – Anthony Johnson

“God has not made any man wholly bad or wholly good; your likes and dislikes are inducing you to label them as such.” – Atharva Veda

“Business is business. If you label it, you limit yourself. Everyone’s welcome as long as you treat people with respect, are alternative-lifestyle friendly and spend money.” – Michael Tierney

“By the end, everybody had a label – pig, liberal, radical, revolutionary… If you had everything but a gun, you were a radical but not a revolutionary.” – Jerry Rubin

“In the years since I first met Paul I’ve had all sorts of labels stuck on me. Now the new label is “businesswomen”. Sure I have this business. But what I am, what I am myself, is a photographer.” – Linda Eastman Mccartney

“Blind tasting is the only way to taste. If you are looking at the label, you might give the wine a break, or any defect could possibly be seen in a positive light.” – Larry Stone

“A lot of people want to talk about Democrat and Republican. The label that matters most to me is Philadelphian.” – Sam Katz

“I do not come bearing a party label on my sleeve – or a quick fix in my back pocket. I do not come with a rigid ideology in my heart – or a soul that tells me to go it alone. I do not come to uproot tradition – or to be imprisoned by it.” – Ted Kulongoski

“Giving a phenomenon a label does not explain it.” – Taylor Caldwell

“Each of you, for himself, by himself and on his own responsibility, must speak. And it is a solemn and weighty responsibility, and not lightly to be flung aside at the bullying of pulpit, press, government, or the empty catchphrases of politicians. Each must for himself alone decide what is right and what is wrong, and which course is patriotic and which isn’t. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To decide against your convictions is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to yourself and to your country, let man label you as they may. If you alone of all the nation shall decide one way, and that way be the right way according to your convictions of the right, you have done your duty by yourself and by your country- hold up your head! You have nothing to be ashamed of.” – Mark Twain

“Maybe some labels are best left in the closet. Maybe when we label people ‘bride,’ ‘groom,’ ‘husband,’ ‘wife,’ ‘married,’ ‘single,’ we forget to look past the label to the person. …” Carrie Bradshaw Sex and the City: The Movie

“I’m used to the pressure. People can label me whatever they want, but I know what I’ve got to do. I’ve got to go out there and work. I’ve got a job. I need to go out there and keep it.” – Rocky McIntosh

“If we had a reliable way to label our toys good and bad, it would be easy to regulate technology wisely. But we can rarely see far enough ahead to know which road leads to damnation. Whoever concerns himself with big technology, either to push it forward or to stop it, is gambling in human lives.” – Freeman Dyson

“I believe that fear is a mind virus that insists you’re either a success or a failure, and it’s passed from one mind to another until it becomes a habit. From an early age, you’re taught to feel: If I don’t succeed at everything I attempt, then I’m a failure as a person- and I’m scared to death of having to live with such an awful label.” – Dr. Wayne W. Dyer, EXCUSES BEGONE!

“Love is just a word, a label; real love is unexplainable.” – Unknown

“I try to avoid a specific image. I seek to play as many different women as I can to avoid having a label put on me.” – Blythe Danner

“It’s fun seeing my label on someone’s behind – I like that.” – Calvin Klein

“Once you are labeled ‘the best’ you wantto stay up there, and you can’t do itby loafing around. If I don’tkeep changing. I’m history.” – Larry Bird

“People who live in the post-totalitarian system know only too well that the question of whether one or several political parties are in power, and how these parties define and label themselves, is of far less importance than the question of whether or not it is possible to live like a human being.” – Vaclav Havel

“Why do we pigeonhole and label an artist? It is a sure way of missing the important, the contradictory, the things that make him or her unique.” – Lukas Foss

“Every mind which has given itself to self-expression in art is aware of a directing agency outside its conscious control which it has agreed to label ‘inspiration’.” – Norman Lindsay

“There is nothing worse that you can do to a human being in America today than give them a mental illness kind of label and tell them they need drugs and these children are 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 years-old being treated in this manner,” – Peter Breggin

“Basically, women have to prove they are strong at all times. And then when they go on the attack, they have to not appear mean because those women often get the label of being catty.” – Julie Nixon Eisenhower

“I never wanted to do the same kind of movies over and over anyway, so my theory on it all is I’m just gonna try and dodge the label and keep doing what I am doing.” – Matt Damon

“Don’t label. That’s a matter of faith.” – Shea Brown

“In Washington, there’s always an effort to label people.” – Gale Norton

“I am concerned about the racial component as it relates to the media, but I also go a step further and I say to my people stop putting yourself into position where people can label you like that.” – Robert Fowler

“People always want to put a label on you; they always want to compare you to something.” – Carrot Top

“I don’t care what you label me as long as you call me president.” – Howard Dean

“If you strip off all your clothes, there’s likely a label somewhere on every piece saying where it was made, but you probably have no idea where the food you are about to put in your mouth came from. Are we really more concerned with what we put on our bodies than with what we put in them?” – Kim Anderson

“Those wearing tolerance for a label call other views intolerable” – Phyllis McGinley

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter
  • RSS

McDonald’s – Burger King… what’s the difference?

Mcdonalds vs BK

I’ve been a vegeterian for a while, so maybe I’m not the right person to write that kind of post, however I’ve always wonder what’s the difference between those two giants in the fast food industry that at least once everybody tried (more travelling to save money :-) )!

Who has the better hamburger: McDonald’s or Burger King? Both of these well-known fast food restaurants have been in business for over 50 years. McDonald’s boasts over 31000 locations worldwide and still expanding. Burger King is in the process of adding to its 11,200 worldwide locations by expanding in Japan, Hong Kong and adding even Macau.

McDonald’s had over 21.6 billion dollars in revenue last year. Burger King had only about 10% of that with the sales totaling 2.06 billion dollars last year. Do these statistics reflect that maybe McDonald’s has the better hamburger?

Some people might say yes, but let’s take a closer look!

Checking both www.mcdonalds.com and www.bk.com you can see that are available what, maybe should interested us the most…  Nutritional Informations!

Comparing the hamburger size McDonald’s weighs slightly less; it is only 100g while Burger King’s weights 121g. Then, looking at the total fat content for each burger it results that McDonald’s hamburger has only 9g of total fat while Burger King’s has 12g, but taking in account the size difference the fat content is  reasonably comparable. It’s interesting also analyze the difference in the salt content. McDonald’s hamburger has 520g of salt, while Burger King’s hamburger has 560g of salt, but again thinking about the size difference in the end the salt content is the same. To complete the picture I checked the carbohydrate count in each hamburger. Burger King is the better choice for those interested in their carbohydrate intake. Burger King, while its hamburger weighs more than McDonald’s hamburger, has less carbohydrates only 30g per sandwich. McDonald’s hamburger has 31g of carbohydrates in it. After all these considarations we can conclude that when we compare the nutritional value of both McDonald’s and Burger King’s hamburgers there’s a really little difference!

But now let’s look at the factors that make these fast-food giants the top two burger chains in the world.

The Menu: What’s the first thing you think of when someone says McDonald’s or Burger King? Probably their signature sandwiches — the Big Mac and the Whopper — because they are what make the brands. There are two factors to look at here — taste and health.

As far as taste goes, my non-scientific point of view says that both sandwiches are surely tasty. I can say I prefer the Burger King’s hamburger with regard to meat. The hamburger is much more thick, giving the idea of being really meat and not just meat scraps as in the case of McDonald. About the bread Burger King’s  binds much less with the contents of the sandwich unlike the bread of McDonald, in whose sandwiches though I find there is a excess of lettuce. Also regarding french fries I absolutely prefer McDonald’s ones, more flavorful and less “frozen”.

Anyways this is just my opinion (and maybe of some other people) but last year Burger King proposed as a strategy of their Marketing campain an “Extreme comparative”, and not without controversy! The idea was to try a Whopper and a Big Mac to people who had never had the chance. Looking out for people in the most remote parts of the world. From that were born  a TV campaign with spots of 15 and 30 seconds, and a documentary, online at www.whoppervirgins.com (I recommend to whatch it!), which would highlights the ‘Virginity’ of the tasters and veracity of the shooting, which have been used no actors.

McDonald’s single biggest accomplishment is their ability to market to children. A great percentage of their business comes from children begging their parents to take them to McDonald’s. For years, Burger King had no answer to this. It had a sad Kid’s Club with B-level promotions, while McDonald’s co-marketed with children’s hits such as Disney, Mattel, and Barbie.

So how did Burger King gain ground on Ronald McDonald? By not competing with them at all, but by targeting a slightly older demographic. It began with the “subservient chicken” ad campaign, capturing the Adult Swim teen audience, and has continued with the “Creepy King” and his Xbox games.

Another diversion in strategy for the two companies is what they are advertising to adults. McDonald’s has been advertising their salads, looking to appease the mothers who bring their children into the golden-arched restaurants, while Burger King has gone the other direction, promoting the Stacker sandwich, a sandwich made of layers of meat and cheese stacking up to four burgers high. This sandwich, I can imagine, caters more to the young stoners that would play an Xbox game based on a fast-food brand.

In a recent interview to a manager of Burger King he answer like this on a question regarding his bigger competitor: “Why the general feeling is that speaking of  itself McDonalds takes more commitment?”
“What we know is that our distinctive strengths are the best quality, superior taste given by the grilling, a strong personality and the’brand’s guarantee. The ability to reinterpret the traditional American food, the opportunity to fill a space in the market traditionally associated with the ‘casual dining’. “

Regardless, Burger King’s strategy of avoiding McDonald’s strengths has paid off, and both chains and their shareholders are savoring the success and “Loving it“, while the rate of obesity (especially among children) is growing in the world ..

How nice it would be if one day we knew what we really do eat!

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Google Chrome OS

google_chrome_os

There was a lot of waiting for the announced presentation (or pre -presentation) of Google Chrome OS, the operating system from Google. Many people thought it was a move by the giant search engine to undermine the substantial monopoly over Microsoft in the operating systems for personal computers, but what has emerged from its debut is anything but this.

As the google’s video says, Google Chrome OS is an operating system whose only purpose is to get started the most quickly as possible to allow the user to do the thing which now does more than any other on the computer: access to the Internet. In the demo, boot and loading the browser requires only around seven seconds. The computer essentially becomes a terminal with some ornament more.

There is no Start menu or Dock: all interaction occurs through browser tabs, including configuration. The e-mails are consulted through Gmail, documents edited with Google Docs, and so on.
Google Chrome OS is a long-term challenge for Microsoft, Apple and the Linux world, because it makes substantially the operating system irrelevant for most applications that do not require the handling of large amounts of data.

So the new operating system is designed specifically for  a web-centric experience. In a very ambitious  way,  Google declares that will built an architecture that will allow the user not having to deal with the usual problems related to viruses and malware definition updates, or security. In a recent statement was said:

“We heard a lot of our users and their message is clear: computers need to be better. The audience wants instant access to the email box, without wasting time waiting for the computer and the browser working properly. They want their computers always as active, quick and responsive as when they bought them. They want their data to be accessible anywhere and do not want to worry of losing them or having to make continuously backups. And, more importantly, it will not take hours to configure the computer with any new hardware or software upgrades. “

But there is always a bottom line: Do we really trust to entrust everything, absolutely everything, including our data, our photos, our mail to Google?

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Cloud Computing – let’s try to understand what lies ahead

When we talk about Cloud Computing we’re not  talking about Google that will cover up Microsoft  or viceversa, this is a new stage in the evolution  of the network.  Cloud computing, namely is the use of applications and services via internet,  with Office 2010  it will become a phenomenon known to all, and will probably change the face of the network and how we use the computer.

Cloud-comp-architettura-wikipedia-2

Yes, cloud computing is the future of the network and to all of us, that are open to the network all days, or almost daily and we use a computer for disparate uses. We will continue to do the same things, but in a radically different way, whose possible trends are almost unpredictable.

What is cloud computing?

The concept of cloud computing is simpler than its hypothetical translation. Up to now we are used to turn on a computer and start a program (software) that allows the creation and editing of documents, playing music and video, send an email or retouching a picture. But there is a large watershed that everyone can  understand clearly: some activities may be held online and others require an Internet connection.

Cloud-comp-architettura-wikipedia-3

I can start a Word document and write a letter, without access to  Internet, but if I need to send an email, I will need a connection to the Web.  Cloud computing puts into question this simple concept, and moves online all, or most of, these activities.

This means that if you write a letter, probably you won’t start anymore Word, but you will open the browser and type in a specific address WWW.

The Cloud computing is based on the concept of  ”Web Application”.

The computer, therefore, should have only the power needed to run Internet Explorer (or Firefox, Chrome,  Safari, Opera, etc) . When Eric Schmidt (Google’s CEO) said “the browser is the computer “, refered exactly to that!

The scenario is therefore of a user who, having a device (no matter what: a PC, a PDA, a smartphone, or who knows what future diabolical apparatus), the right browser and a connection to access the cloud that provides the right services and / or data that are needed. Often these services will be ‘composed’ as desired by the user  in the context of its needs. In this way he can create a tool ‘customized’ made of a mosaic of functions derived from the sum of individuals web services.
Another new aspect is the ability to ‘move’ the data from your PC / device on a ‘cloud’ with the result  of having everything we need anywhere, worldwide.

Not bad! Wherever you go accessing the internet and retrieve data, software and related services as if you were at home or at work, a true relocation of resources.
For now, the cloud computing provides services to manage photo and video archives, email, calendar  appointments, the management of texts and documents,  including spreadsheets. Of course, to all which is already present only on the web (blogs, virtual communities, maps and / or road and so on). But soon this will be true also for the storage of all the generics files. It should be noted that the dream of being able  to eliminate the famous desktop PC is dated and there are long throngs of supporters of the ‘open distributed computing’ that understand  the use of software applications residing on their PC but available through the network (Internet this case).

But why right now we are off balance on ‘cloud computing’?

Because the technologies and networks are mature and also market, especially advertising. Coincidentally Schmidt speaks of ‘clouds’ in close connection with his magic word: ‘advertising’. From an engineering’s point of view a big help was given by the advent of XML (eXtended Markup Language) as the protocol (almost) standard for interchange of information between editing software: it made the creation of web services accessible via the Internet by  very different systems.
XML  enables computers that speak different languages and operate in different ways to exchange information and understand each other.

So what lies ahead?

The answer is simple: If all these technologies will develop an impressive body of data of any kind that will be available in different ‘clouds’ and their managers are repositories of a vast amount of information: What will become of our privacy? It will be like a ‘Big Brother, the eye that scrutinizes persistentely our lives, if not our thoughts…. I thought we already had God for this!

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter
  • RSS

My future vision of Internet

social-network

Internet is a network of computers and today we can include also gadgets like iPhone, SmartPhone, NetBook that somehow have something to do with the original concept of Computer, then eventually Internet is not the website or the portal, but rather the network that was created before,no matter what you do with it.

The web is instead a “universe” which was entirely invented on the Internet network and consists essentially in Server Software installed on some computers (server or host) scattered in some node on the Internet, and so we reach a different “level” than the previous one (internet).  So Internet is different from the Web.

For years the web was populated by Websites, Portals, Social sites almost all sharing a few common patterns of development: PHP, HTML, Apache, Server-Client (the latter inherited from the very structure of the Internet), and all these products who populated the web could be called  little “inventions” themself that gradually have been “unified” for example in a social network like Facebook. Just think that since joining Facebook at least the average population, with a medium-low knowledge of technology used for ICT has almost stopped using most of the services that previously were used in a deployed anywhere. With facebook you send “emails” (private messages from users), you can have conversations like “messaging”(chat), you can share files in the same manner as the file sharing (Post photos and videos), you can write articles like in a “blog” ( you can leave a message on somebody’s wall, you can create groups of discussions or thread like in the forums (leaving comments or tagging contents), today is also possible to create your own business on-line through Facebook … all this in the most total ignorance of  the structure that we have below. We move into Facebook as we’re making steps in a big city, the only difference is that we ignore the fact that it’s a web-based environment which in the Internet’s terminology is seen as a single place.

Internet is the interconnection between the cities of the world in ways and means of transportation, once we used to go into the city-blog  of one guy and then  we used to send  an email to another town of another guy… and so on. Then one day was builted one huge city, a super-equipped one and became sufficient to go to one town to do the activities for which in the past it was necessary to move through all those different cities … and that’s Facebook …

So, we got here, I see that the future of Internet may be few and huge environments that are now called social networks, which will be based on the current layer called social Web …. and our future layer of “action” will be at the top of this layer “social” that include real gigantic web applications that have an enormous range of languages, interfaces, etc … and so on to communicate with the levels below.

Internet is still stratified, today we are witnessing the formation of a layer formed by the giant social-networks that will interface with existing web and allowing entire groups of people to perform many operations that today would take hours if not months of work .

The entire Internet is based on the concept of levels, well Facebook is nothing but the last layer on which people built what they builted first on the underlying layer  … Twitter and now Google Wave are other new good examples!

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Use creativity to spread a good message!

Here you can find 2 very good examples of how true creativity can help to spread a message either for business or good causes as the second one (in spanish).. enjoy!

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

When the true creativity can convey a good message!

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Cuando la verdadera creatividad puede transmitir un mensaje positivo!

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter
  • RSS

L’amore secondo i bambini – Love seen through the eyes of children

bambini

1. L’amore è quando esci a mangiare e dai un sacco di patatine fritte a qualcuno senza volere che l’altro le dia a te.

(Gianluca, 6 anni)

2. Quando nonna aveva l’artrite e non poteva mettersi più lo smalto, nonno lo faceva per lei anche se aveva l’artrite pure lui. Questo è l’amore.

(Rebecca, 8 anni)

3. L’amore è quando la ragazza si mette il profumo, il ragazzo il dopobarba, poi escono insieme per annusarsi.

(Martina, 5 anni)

4. L’amore è la prima cosa che si sente, prima che arrivi la cattiveria.

(Carlo, 5 anni)

5. L’amore è quando qualcuno ti fa del male e tu sei molto arrabbiato, ma non strilli per non farlo piangere.

(Susanna, 5 anni)

6. L’amore è quella cosa che ci fa sorridere quando siamo stanchi.

(Tommaso, 4 anni)

7. L’amore è quando mamma fa il caffè per papà e lo assaggia prima per assicurarsi che sia buono.

(Daniele, 7 anni)

8. L’amore è quando mamma dà a papà il pezzo più buono del pollo.

(Elena, 5 anni)

9. L’amore è quando il mio cane mi lecca la faccia, anche se l’ho lasciato solo tutta la giornata.

(Anna Maria, 4 anni)

10. Non bisogna mai dire “Ti amo” se non è vero. Ma se è vero bisogna dirlo tante volte. Le persone dimenticano.

(Jessica,8 anni)

——————

1. Love is when you go out to eat french fries and you give them to someone else without wanting him/her to give them back to you.

(Gianluca, 6 years old)

2. When my grandmother had arthritis and could not put more polish on her nails,  my grandfather did it for her even though he also had arthritis. This is love.

(Rebecca, 8 years old)

3. Love is when a girl puts on perfume and a boy the aftershave, then they go out together to sniff each other.

(Martina, 5 years old)

4. Love is the first thing you hear, before it reaches the nastiness.

(Carlo, 5 years old)

5. Love is when someone hurts you and you are very angry, but  you do not scream because you don’t want make him/her crying.

(Susanna, 5 years old)

6. Love is the thing that makes us smile when we are tired.

(Tommaso 4 years old)

7. Love is when mom makes coffee for Dad and she tastes it first to make sure it’s good.

(Daniele, 7 years old)

8. Love is when mom gives dad the most delicious piece of chicken.

(Elena, 5 years old)

9. Love is when my dog licks my face, even if I left him alone all day long.

(Anna Maria, 4 years old)

10. You should never say “I love you” if it’s not true. But if it is  we sholud say it  many times. People forget.

(Jessica, 8 years old)

Source: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#/profile.php?id=1646283714&v=info

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter
  • RSS

La voz a ti debida – Pedro Salinas

el_escritor_pedro_salinas

La forma de querer tú

La forma de querer tú
es dejarme que te quiera.
El sí con que te me rindes
es el silencio. Tus besos
son ofrecerme los labios
para que los bese yo.
Jamás palabras, abrazos,
me dirán que tú existías,
que me quisiste: Jamás.
Me lo dicen hojas blancas,
mapas, augurios, teléfonos;
tú, no.
Y estoy abrazado a ti
sin preguntarte, de miedo
a que no sea verdad
que tú vives y me quieres.
Y estoy abrazado a ti
sin mirar y sin tocarte.
No vaya a ser que descubra
con preguntas, con caricias,
esa soledad inmensa
de quererte sólo yo.

Il modo tuo d’amare

Il modo tuo d’amare
è lasciare che io t’ami.
Il sì con cui ti abbandoni
è il silenzio. I tuoi baci
sono offrirmi le labbra
perché io le baci.
Mai parole e abbracci
mi diranno che esistevi
e mi hai amato: mai.
Me lo dicono fogli bianchi,
mappe, telefoni, presagi;
tu, no.
E sto abbracciato a te
senza chiederti nulla, per timore
che non sia vero
che tu vivi e mi ami.
E sto abbracciato a te
senza guardare e senza toccarti.
Non debba mai scoprire
con domande, con carezze
quella solitudine immensa
d’amarti solo io.

———————————————–

No rechaces los sueños por ser sueños

No rechaces los sueños por ser sueños.
Todos los sueños pueden
ser realidad, si el sueño no se acaba.
La realidad es un sueño. Si soñamos
que la piedra es la piedra, eso es la piedra.
Lo que corre en los ríos no es un agua,
es un soñar, el agua, cristalino.
La realidad disfraza
su propio sueño, y dice:
«Yo soy el sol, los cielos, el amor».
Pero nunca se va, nunca se pasa,
si fingimos creer que es más que un sueño.
Y vivimos soñándola. Soñar
es el modo que el alma
tiene para que nunca se le escape
lo que se escaparía si dejamos
de soñar que es verdad lo que no existe.
Sólo muere
un amor que ha dejado de soñarse
hecho materia y que se busca en tierra.

Non respingere i sogni perché sono sogni

Non respingere i sogni perché sono sogni.
Tutti i sogni possono
essere realtà, se il sogno non finisce.
La realtà è un sogno.Se sogniamo
che la pietra è pietra, questo è la pietra.
Ciò che scorre nei fiumi non è acqua,
è un sognare, l’acqua, cristallina.
La realtà traveste
il sogno, e dice:
“Io sono il sole, i cieli, l’amore”.
Ma mai si dilegua, mai passa,
se fingiamo di credere che è più che un sogno.
E viviamo sognandola.Sognare
è il mezzo che l’anima ha
perché non le fugga mai
ciò che fuggirebbe se smettessimo
di sognare che è realtà ciò che non esiste.
Muore solo
un amore che ha smesso di essere sognato
fatto materia e che si cerca sulla terra.

No rechaces los sueños por ser sueños

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter
  • RSS

“What You See Might Not Be Real”

emergency_escape_by_chen_wenling_01-500x332

La crisi finanziaria rappresentata in modo piutosto fantasioso ma sicuramente eloquente dall’artista cinese Chen Wenling. La singolare opera si chiama “What You See Might Not Be Real” ed al momento è esposta al Joy Art Laboratory di Beijing.
Il toro rappresenta Wall Street, mentre l’uomo mentre l’uomo Bernard (Bernie) Madoff.

Il finanziere americano protagonista di una delle più grandi truffe della storia che si aggira attorno ai 65 miliardi di dollari; è stato condannato a ben 150 anni di carcere. Ad oggi sono stati recuperati circa 45 milioni da sua moglie Ruth, ma il liquidatore della società punta ad incassarne ancora circa 200 milioni dai figli, Mark e Andrew e  altri parenti, per risarcire in parte le vittime della truffa!

Tornando però all’artista.. le opere di Chen Wenling sono molto interessanti e meritano un’attenzione particolare. Secodo una visione a lui ben chiara che ai nostri occhi magari appare piuttosto sopra le righe l’artista vuole rappresentare allegoricamente la sua personale lotta al consumismo che rappresenta la Cina ad oggi.

Le sculture di Chen Wenling raffigurano immagini intangibili dell’epoca in cui la Cina è diventata consumista e, adottando una visualizzazione allegorizzata, rivelano quanto il materialismo abbia pervaso, negli anni Novanta, un’intera generazione e quale sia la condizione personale vissuta dai cinesi da quel momento in poi. I due temi principali delle opere di Chen Wenling sono le manifestazioni di un’umanità estremizzata e le immagini intangibili del consumismo.

Un artista che merita attenzione!

———

The financial crisis represented  imaginatively, by the Chinese artist Chen Wenling  is certainly eloquent. The unique work is called “What You See Might Not Be Real” and is currently exhibited at Joy Art Laboratory in Beijing.
The bull represents Wall Street, while the man Bernard (Bernie) Madoff. 

The American financier was the protagonist of one of the biggest scams in the history which amounts around  65 billions of dollars. Madoff  has been sentenced to 150 years in prison. Now about 45 millions were recovered from his wife Ruth, but the liquidator of the company aims to COLLECT still about 200 million from his sons, Mark and Andrew and other family members,  to compensate  partly the victims of the scam!

But returning to the artist .. Chen Wenling’s work is very interesting and deserve a special attention. Through a very clear vision, that to our eyes might seem rather over the top, the artist wants to represent allegorically his personal fight against consumerism that rapresents China today.

The sculptures of Chen Wenling  are intangible images of an era in which China has become a consumerist  country and, by adopting an allegorized view , reveals how in the 90′s whole generation was pervaded by  materialism, and what was the personal situation experienced by chinese from thereafter. The two main themes of the  Chen Wenling’s work are an extreme manifestations of humanity and intangible images of consumerism.

An artist that deserves attention!

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter
  • RSS

To Love…

Canova – Amore e Psichecanova-amore-psiche

Il verbo amare è uno dei più difficili da coniugare: il suo passato non è semplice, il presente non è indicativo  e il futuro non è che un condizionale…

The verb to love is one of the most difficult to combine: its past is not simple, its present is not indicative and the future is just a conditional …

J. Cocteau

Cosa significa amare? Troppe volte si inflaziona questo verbo e tutto ciò che ne ruota attorno.. cosa distingue un sentimento puro, sincero, incondizionato da istinti e sensazioni dettate dalla passione, dall’ardore, a volte solo dall’ impulso sessuale primordiale?!

Difficile a dirsi, difficile a definirsi…

Ho letto più volte che una semplice distinzione può essere data dal fatto che il primo è appunto il sentimento reale d’ amare come un genitore prova nei confronti di un figlio; il secondo caso descrive invece l’Innamoramento, quella fase incontrollabile in cui tutto il mondo sembra sorriderti, il bisogno fisico e mentale dell’altro ti annulla e pensi di impazzire al solo pensiero di poter perdere queste sensazioni, che oltre al piacere intrinseco ti fanno sentire VIVO!

In un film di F. Truffaut (La signora della porta accanto) l’attore principale dice: ” Io ti amavo, tu eri innamorata. Non è la stessa cosa.”

Ed è vero. Cosa succede quando l’innamoramento passa?

E’ questo l’argomento che mi interessa di più: l’amore, la sua crescita, la mancanza d’amore, la  morte dell’amore, il dolore provocato dalla perdita delle cose che ci sono più necessarie.

Ma sono davvero così necessarie? Forse in fondo no, ma è così che ci innamoriamo, cercando nella persona amata il punto che non ha mai rivelato, pensando che questo basti affinchè rimanga con noi per sempre.

Ma in fondo al nostro cuore sappiamo che questa rivelazione non è davvero necessaria… poichè la vita è soltanto un giallo, un’ indagine che conduciamo ogni giorno su noi stessi per tentare di fare luce sulle nostre zone d’ombra.

Se in questa investigazione.. durante il cammino c’è qualcuno a tenerti la mano.. beh forse questo è amore..

In fondo da soli si cammina più velocemente… ma in due si va più lontano!

—–

What does it mean to love? Too many times we inflate this verb and everything revolves around it .. What distinguishes a feeling pure, sincere, unconditional  from irrationals instincts and feelings dictated by passion or sometimes only from a ‘primordial sex drive?!

Hard to say, difficult to define …

I have read several times that a simple distinction can be given by the fact that the former is precisely the real sentiment of love like the one that a parent feels towards his child, the second case describes falling in love  a phase in which uncontrollably seems that the all world is smiling at you, your physical and mental need cancels the rest and you think you would go crazy at the thought of losing these feelings, which in addition to the intrinsic pleasure make you feel alive!

In a movie of F. Truffaut (The Woman Next Door) the main actor says: “I loved you, you were in love. It is not the same thing.”

And it’s true. What happens when love goes?

And this is the topic that interests me most : love, its growth, the lack of love, death of love, the pain caused by the loss of things that we needed the most.

But are those things really so necessary? At the bottom maybe not! But that is how we fall in love, seeking in the person loved the point that he/she never revealed, thinking that this is enough to keep them with us forever.

But in the bottom of our hearts we know that this revelation is not really necessary … because life is just like a crime novel, a survey that we conduct ourselves everyday trying to shed light on our shadows.

If on the way  of this investigation there is someone to hold your hand .. Well maybe this is love ..

After all, alone you walk faster … but it goes further in two!

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter
  • RSS